Hero Image
Virtual b2b-Matchmaking
German-Dutch Fieldlab: Artificial Intelligence for Digital Twins (AI4DT)
Register now
Open until 31 December 2022

Digital Twin

The digital twin is currently a widely discussed technology, which is associated with great potential and opportunities for the industry.[5] However, the digital twin is still a fairly new technology and many companies are still faced with the questions of what a digital twin is, what it can do, how it can be implemented and what opportunities it offers.[5] Therefore, this website will introduce the digital twin concept and explain its practical application and implementation.

Nowadays, companies from the industrial environment are confronted with increased market requirements such as an increasing number of product variants, shortened product life cycles or short reaction times.[1] In order to remain competitive in the future and meet the demands of the market, companies require increased flexibility, higher production quality and resilient and adaptive processes.[1] [2]

Industry 4.0, digitalisation and the resulting intelligent networking offer the opportunity to build flexible and adaptable value creation systems that enable higher productivity at lower costs and offer the chance to meet the specified requirements in a flexible way.[3] [4]

The digital twin is one of the most up-to-date innovations that is currently being discussed in the context of Industry 4.0 and is also regarded as a core element of Industry 4.0.[5] [2] The Digital Twin is associated with great potential and opportunities, therefore, changing the industry significantly.[5]

What is a Digital Twin?

The German government's Industrie 4.0 Platform defines the digital twin briefly as a „virtual digital representation of physical assets“. [30]

Fraunhofer IOSB defines the digital twin in more detail as follows:

„The Digital Twin is a concept that models products as well as machines and their components using digital tools, including all geometry, kinematics and logic data. A digital twin is the image of the physical ‘asset‘ in the real factory and allows its simulation, control and improvement.“ [11] [9]

Four essential components of a Digital Twin are represented by the following elements:[7]

  • a digital/virtual representation​
  • a (directional) information exchange between the physical and virtual world​
  • a life cycle view​
  • a composition of different models, some of which are suitable for simulation. ​

Taking into account the aforementioned components, it becomes clear that the digital twin is a virtual image of an object. The object can be tangible or intangible (e.g. product, system, process or service).[6] Furthermore, it is emphasised that there is an exchange of data between the physical and virtual object and it is pointed out that the digital twin accompanies the physical object throughout its entire life cycle and digitally reflects it across different stations (development, production, use, etc.) [8]. The last component illustrates that the digital twin consists of different models and, if necessary, is created with different digital tools on suitable platforms.[6] [9]

In summary, it is possible to state the following about the digital twin:

The digital twin is a digital representation of tangible or intangible objects (e.g. devices, machines, systems, services) and is created with several digital tools. The digital representation contains characteristics, states and the behaviour of an object or system and is fed by data that is exchanged between the physical and virtual world. Furthermore, the digital representation accompanies the physical object throughout its life cycle and during individual life cycle phases various models, information and data are linked with each other in the digital representation. This allows the physical object and its behaviour to be monitored, controlled, improved and simulated.[6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

What are the terminologies of a Digital Twin?

Digital Model:

A digital model is a digital representation of an existing or planned physical object that does not use any form of automated data exchange between the physical object and the digital object (see Figure 1). The digital representation may contain a more or less comprehensive description of the physical object. At the same time, these models (simulation models, mathematical models, etc.) do not include any automated data integration. This means that all data exchange is done manually. A change of state of the physical object has no direct effect on the digital object and vice versa.[21]

Figure 1: Data transfer in digital model

Digital Shadow:

If there is an automated one-way data flow between the state of a physical object and a digital object, we can speak of a digital shadow (see Figure 2). This means that a change of state of the physical object leads to a change of state of the digital object, but not vice versa.[21]

Figure 2: Data transfer in digital shadow

Digital Twin:

If data flows are fully integrated between a physical object and a digital object in both directions, we can speak of a digital twin (see Figure 3). In such a combination, the digital object could also function as a control instance of the physical object. There can also be other objects, physical or digital, that cause changes in the state of the digital object. A change of state in the physical object leads directly to a change of state in the digital object and vice versa.[21]

Figure 3: Data transfer in digital twin

What advantages and potentials does a Digital Twin offer?

The digital twin creates the necessary transparency to virtually design, test and optimise products, processes and systems. New applications and business models, but also partnerships, can be tested digitally without having to build them in reality.[20] This implies that digital twins have the ability to represent different information in a uniform format. However, digital twins are more than just data. They contain algorithms that accurately describe their real-world counterpart.[25] At a high level of sophistication, the digital twin even gives feedback directly to its physical brother, and together they form a self-controlling and self-improving AI system. Information management is the key to providing relevant information to decision-makers in a timely and secure manner.[20] The digital twin offers further advantages through simulation in the engineering phase. This improves collaboration between experts, as complex scenarios can be better explained through simulations. Furthermore, the application increases efficiency as well as the possibility to carry out a virtual commissioning. This shortens commissioning times. In addition, real-time monitoring makes it possible to respond quickly to changes in condition, which supports maintenance.[7]

Positive synergies also result from digital twins on supply chains. By monitoring and simulating events (e.g. natural disasters, trade disputes, etc.) that affect supply chains, digital twins enable an early and proactive response. In addition, end customers also benefit from digital twins. For example, products can be visualised in 3D in advance for customers, creating a closer and more personalised customer experience.[26]

How does a Digital Twin work?

In order to exploit the potential of a digital twin, it is essential to know its architecture. Due to the continuous and dynamic expansion of the scope of digital twins, it is necessary to extend the three-dimensional model proposed by Grieves (2002) into a five-dimensional model. This new model consists of the following five dimensions: physical objects, digital objects, services, data and connections (see Figure 4).[29]

Figure 4: The five-dimensional digital twin model

1. The physical object is the basis of a digital twin and can be represented by a device or product. With the help of a sensor, information is gathered in form of data from the real world (e.g. measurement of physical and chemical quantities). The generated data is stored (some examples of storage methods are database and cloud storage) and transmitted between the physical and virtual world, creating a connection.[29]

2. A digital object is developed from a physical object to reproduce the physical properties and behaviour of the object in the real world. A variety of models and simulation tools are required to create the virtual model.[29]

3. Another dimension of the model proposed by Tao[29] are the services. From the dynamic flow of data that is generated by this model, it is possible to perform several services such as: simulation, verification, optimisation, diagnosis and prediction .[29]

4. Data is a very important factor in the architecture of the digital twin. A very transcendental issue is the origin of this data. The data can be obtained from physical objects, generated by digital objects as result of a simulation, provided by the services, supplied by experts in the subject or extracted from existing data.[29]

5. The connections are the fifth dimension of this model. Digital objects are dynamically connected to their real-world counterparts to enable advanced simulation, operation and analysis. The connections between physical entities, virtual models, services and data, enable the exchange of information. As shown in Figure 4 there are 6 connections in this model.[29]

What are the areas of application of Digital Twin technology?

The digital twin presents a wide range of application areas due to its characteristics and its great technical potential. The following table (see Table 1) shows the possible applications and the added value of this technology [5]

Area Description
  • Digital twins visualise and optimise the material flow. This allows to identify the workloads in the logistical processes and a complete network fleet management ​
  • Real-time monitoring of logistical processes​
  • Real-time monitoring of network fleet management​
Manufacturing Company
  • Digital twins within manufacturing companies monitor and control the machines and production lines. Based on this, simulations and improvements can independently develop customized solutions ​
  • Detection of flaws with subsequent proposal of solutions
  • New networks can be planned and installed faster in new regions using historical data as a planning basis. The digital twin monitors the network structures and consequently enables the adjustment of the connection speed in case of high or low utilization of the network system
  • The digital twin of a patient reproduces his or her health data completely. This allows the simulation of medical operations and the intake of special drugs, as well as their side effects.
  • Suggestions for the best possible individual therapy​
  • The digital twin of, e.g. transformers, enables continuous real-time monitoring and consequently early detection of flaws as well as simulations of new power plants ​
  • Enables predictive maintenance​
  • A digital twin can be used to monitor and control data centers (e.g. temperature), as well as design and simulate new facilities
  • Early identification of flaws​
  • Digital twins can be used, for example, on aircraft engines to identify early failures by analyzing the technical data (e.g. oil temperature, oil pressure) ​
  • Enables predictive maintenance​
Smart City
  • Enables intelligent traffic control of entire cities ​
  • Smart parking management​
Connected Car
  • The digital twin maps extensive vehicle data in real time and can react to it using simulations (e.g. engine condition). Real-time geodata also provides specific warnings according to the location (e.g. black ice)​
  • Enables predictive maintenance​

Table 1: Areas of application of digital twins [5]

What are the challenges of Digital Twins?

So far, there is no standardised architecture for the digital twin. This implies that institutions and companies can develop individual digital twins, depending on the specific application and product. Another challenge is that the digital twin often only describes one lifecycle stage and does not continue through several lifecycle phases. Therefore, it is necessary for the digital twin to continue throughout the lifecycle of the physical counterpart. In order to achieve this, different companies must work together and cooperate. Otherwise, the potential of the digital twin will not be fully exploited.[7] [27]

There are several challenges for the management of digital twins. These include the identification and data management of the product along the product life cycle, the creation of simulation models in different IT systems and the control of the huge amounts of data.[9] The simulation models in particular form the basis for the diversity of a digital twin. This heterogeneity is one of the major challenges for the concept of the digital twin. In order to overcome this problem, a continuous flow of information between the heterogeneous models is necessary. Co-simulation and cognition are technologies that address this challenge of heterogeneity and are already established in many application areas. For co-simulation, different simulation tools have to be coupled, whereas cognition is about the ability to analyse and visualise information. However, these technologies require adaptations and extensions to meet the expectations of the digital twin.[6]

Another challenge in the implementation of the digital twin in some application areas, is the data feedback and the associated direct manipulation of the real object by the digital twin. Currently, the possibilities of technical application are still limited in practice[1]. In addition, the quality of the data used regarding to topicality, relevance, accuracy and consistency must also be taken into account. This affects the informative value of the digital twin, which, for example, allows statements to be made about the performance of production.[22]


[1] Overbeck et al.
    Overbeck, Leonard; Brützel, Oliver; Stricker, Nicole; Lanza, Gisela (2020): Digitaler Zwilling des Produktionssystems. In: ZWF 115 (special), S. 62–65. DOI: 10.3139/104.112326 .
[2] Ohnemus
    Ohnemus, Thomas (2020): The Digital Twin – A Critical Enabler of Industry 4.0. In: ZWF 115 (special), S. 23–25. DOI: 10.3139/104.112308 .
[3] Schuh et al.
    Schuh, G.; Häfner, C.; Hopmann, C.; Rumpe, B.; Brockmann, M.; Wortmann, A. et al. (2020): Effizientere Produktion mit Digitalen Schatten. In: ZWF 115 (special), S. 105–107. DOI: 10.3139/104.112339 .
[4] Plattform Industrie 4.0
    Plattform Industrie 4.0: Chancen durch Industrie 4.0. Von smarten Objekten und vernetzten Maschinen zurück zum Menschen. Online verfügbar unter https://www.plattform-i40.de/PI40/Redaktion/DE/Standardartikel/chancen-durch-industrie-40.html, zuletzt geprüft am 16.12.20.
[5] Bux et al.
    Bux, Andreas R.; Dettling, Lea; Kraft, Steffen; Langenbahn, Jasmine; Lutz, Marvin; Moser, Sabrina et al. (2020): Der Digitale Zwilling im Produktlebenszyklus eines produzierenden Unternehmens. Welche Möglichkeiten bieten der Digitale Zwilling, Digitale Schatten und das Digitale Modell im Produktlebenszyklus? Hg. v. Reutlinger Zentrum Industrie 4.0, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.20.
[6] Eigner
    Eigner, Martin (2020): Digitaler Zwilling – Stand der Technik. In: ZWF 115 (special), S. 3–6. DOI: 10.3139/104.112300 .
[7] Klein et al.
    M. Klein, B. Maschler, A. Zeller, B. Ashtari Talkhestani, N. Jazdi, R. Rosen, M. Weyrich: Architektur und Technologiekomponenten eines digitalen Zwillings" in VDI-Kongress Automation 2019, Baden-Baden, 2019.
[8] Winkler et al.
    Winkler, Sven; Schumann, Marco; Apitzsch, René; Klimant, Franziska; Klimant, Philipp (2020): Der Digitale Zwilling – Probleme und Lösungsansätze. In: ZWF 115 (special), S. 121–124. DOI: 10.3139/104.112328 .
[9] Sauer
    Sauer, Olaf (2018): Digitale Zwillinge existieren für die wenigsten Maschinen und Anlagen. Hg. v. Automobil Produktion.
[10] Stark et al.
    Osterwalder, Alexander; Pigneur, Yves (2011): Business model generation. Ein Handbuch für Visionäre, Spielveränderer und Herausforderer. 1. Auflage. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag.
[11] Detecon
    Detecon Consulting (2019): Digitale Zwillinge – Wegbereiter für Ökosysteme von morgen. Detecon Consulting.
[12] Osterwalder et al.
    Osterwalder, Alexander; Pigneur, Yves (2011): Business model generation. Ein Handbuch für Visionäre, Spielveränderer und Herausforderer. 1. Auflage. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag
[13] Deuter, Pethig
    Deuter, Andreas; Pethig, Florian (2019): The Digital Twin Theory. Eine neue Sicht auf ein Modewort. In: I40M 2019 (1), S. 27–30. DOI: 10.30844/I40M_19-1_S27-30 .
[14] Qi, Qinglin et al.
    Qi, Qinglin; Tao, Fei; Hu, Tianliang; Anwer, Nabil; Liu, Ang; Wei, Yongli et al. (2019): Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. In: Journal of Manufacturing Systems. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001 .
[15] Massive B.S.
    Massive Business Solutions: Database Analysis Dashboard.
[16] Deloitte, Sallaba et al.
    Monitor Deloitte (2017): Grenzenlos vernetzt - Smarte Digitalisierung durch IoT, Digital Twins und Supra-Plattform. Unter Mitarbeit von Milan Sallaba, Andreas Gentner und Ralf Esser.
[17] Kunath et al.
    Kunath, Martin; Winkler, Herwig (2019): Adaptive Assistenzsysteme zur Entscheidungsunterstützung für die dynamische Auftragsabwicklung: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen und Anwendungsszenarien unter Berücksichtigung des Digitalen Zwillings des Produktionssystems. In: Robert Obermaier (Hg.): Handbuch Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Transformation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, S. 269–294.
[18] Lim et al.
    Lim, Kendrik Yan Hong; Zheng, Pai; Chen, Chun-Hsien (2020): A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives. In: J Intell Manuf 31 (6), S. 1313–1337. DOI: 10.1007/s10845-019-01512-w .
[19] Golovatchev
    Golovatchev; Julius (2020): Digitaler Zwilling für die Realisierung Utility 4.0. In: Oliver D. Doleski (Hg.): Praxis der digitalen Energiewirtschaft vom Vertrieb bis zu innovativen energy services. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Vieweg (Realisierung Utility 4.0, Band 2), S. 593–609.
[20] Weber, Grosser
    Weber, Uwe; Grosser, Hendrik (2019): Digitale Zwillinge. Wegbereiter für Ökosysteme von morgen.
[21] Kritzinger et al.
    Kritzinger, Werner; Karner, Matthias; Traar, Georg; Henjes, Jan; Sihn, Wilfried (2018): Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (11), S. 1016–1022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 Titel anhand dieser DOI in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen.
[22] Emmelmann et al.
    Emmelmann, Claus; Beckmann, Frank; Pettke, Alexander (2019): Die Rolle des Digitalen Zwillings in der AM-Linienintegration. In: Lightweight Des 12 (5), S. 52–57. DOI: 10.1007/s35725-019-0057-z In Citavi anzeigen.
[23] Köllner
    Köllner, Cristiane (2019): Was bringt ein digitaler Zwilling? Hg. v. Springer Professional.
[24] Deuter; Pethig
    Deuter, Andreas; Pethig, Florian (2019): The Digital Twin Theory. In: I40M 2019 (1), S. 27–30. DOI: 10.30844/I40M_19-1_S27-30 In Citavi anzeigen.
[25] Kuhn
    Kuhn, Thomas (2017): Digitaler Zwilling. In: Informatik Spektrum 40 (5), S. 440–444. DOI: 10.1007/s00287-017-1061-2 Titel anhand dieser DOI in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen.
[26] Dharmani, Llulla
    EY Global Advanced Manufacturing & Mobility Supply Chain Leade, Wie digitale Zwillinge Autoherstellern reale Vorteile bringen
[27] Hick et al.
    Hick H., Bajzek M., Kranabitl P., Faustmann C. (2020): Erweitertes Digital-Twin-Konzept unter Berücksichtigung des Entwicklers Hg. v. ZWF Digitaler Zwilling, zuletzt geprüft am 14.12.20.
[28] Göckel
    Göckel N., Müller P. (2020): Entwicklung und Betrieb Digitaler Zwillinge Hg. v. ZWF Aus der Industrie, zuletzt gerpüft am 15.12.20.
[29] Tao et al
    Tao F, Liu W, Zhang M, et al. Five-dimension digital twin model and its ten applications. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 2019;25(1):1–18.
[30] BMWI & BMBF
    Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie & Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2021): Glosar -Industrie 4.0.
[31] Massive B.S.
    Database analysis Dashboard; Massive Business Solutions - Big Solutions For Your Business; Massive Calgary


Virtual b2b-Matchmaking

Organised by


Austria 1
Germany 40
Netherlands 37
Singapore 1
Total 79


Association/Agency 14
Authority/Government 6
Company 19
Consulting/Service 13
Non-Profit Organization 3
Research Institution 8
SME (< 500 employees) 3
University 10
Other 3
Total 79